In Challengers, director Luca Guadagnino puts his usual obsessive attention to sensual detail to use in a hard-charging sports picture twisted around a juicy relationship drama. Its first shots find sweat dripping in slow-motion off the faces of its main competitors—one-time friends who are now rivals in a tournament. One (Mike Faist) is a wealthy tennis pro; the other is a struggling wild card (Josh O’Connor). When they were teenagers, they both had a crush on the same rising tennis star (Zendaya). Their paths merged and diverged over a decade. One dated her. The other married her. An elaborately structured screenplay volleys between timelines, stretching what a lesser effort might make the climactic match across all two-hours of the film while sketching in the details of their criss-crossed, intertwined romantic lives. Guadagnino makes of this his usual tale of romantic obsessions and lustful appetites marveling at what the human body can do. His camera drinks in the physical beauty of his stars, while his style swoops and zooms and cuts with an ecstatic aesthetic. It has the precision scrambling chronology, snappy dialogue, and the techno-momentum of a pulsating Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross score, which lends the film some of the surface cool of The Social Network. It also has talented young actors effortlessly embodying suggestive body language in a screenplay of crackling dialogue that bops and zips with repartee that might as well be tennis balls.
Guadagnino’s investment in sexual tension has the film sizzling and throbbing on a different wavelength. His films are always attuned to an intimacy of touch and the suspense of lingering looks—one doesn’t make the yearning romance of Call Me By Your Name or the tingling pool-side thriller of A Bigger Splash without a keen sense of physical and emotional textures. In Challengers, that’s all compounded the sheer physical exertion of a sports movie sends pulsing energy through its teasing, tense love triangle that wraps itself into knots of jealousies and frustrations that are professional, romantic, and athletic all at once. Each sizzling interaction plays like a dramatic volley across the net, complications arising with the regular sensation of a serve and a score. Zendaya plays a steely ref between the competitors, complicated by her own thwarted career aims sublimated into her husband’s. For their part, the guys are complicated, fascinating figures, too—by turns preening and pathetic and always carrying a capacity for physical prowess. Here’s a movie about three fascinating people driven by their appetites—for each other, for winning, and for whatever success feels like. They end up manipulating themselves as much as others. The way the characters shift and share and shame across the run time, refracted through the competition animating the sequences, are finely-tuned drama. When Guadagnino goes hard on the style—taking his camera on a tennis-ball-view or slowing down to watch every rippling muscle twitch or secret speechless message—it takes the sensational drama all the farther. It’s entirely an invigorating, enlivening experience. Where most modern melodramas trend toward the plodding, here’s one that dances.
Showing posts with label Luca Guadagnino. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Luca Guadagnino. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 1, 2024
Thursday, June 2, 2016
Clash on a Hot Italian Roof: A BIGGER SPLASH
A Bigger Splash is
a sensual melodrama with sun-baked Italian noir intentions that don’t fully
reveal themselves until late in the film. Until then it spends a good long time
watching its characters behave, collecting them in a contained space and
tracking their interactions, subtle shifts in demeanor, taking and giving
offense, drawn to and repulsed by each other. There’s an androgynous rock
goddess (Tilda Swinton) recovering from vocal chord surgery staying at an
isolated villa on a small Italian island with her handsome documentarian
boyfriend (Matthias Schoenaerts). They’re comfortable and quiet, enjoying
reading and sunning, mostly nude. So it’s a rude awakening to change their
routine – and cover up a bit – when they have unexpected guests in the form of
the rocker’s ex, a preening music producer (Ralph Fiennes) and his 22-year-old
daughter (Dakota Johnson), who he only recently learned existed. They come to
overshadow their vacation, quite literally blotting out the sun with their
arrival as their descending plane casts its silhouette on a sunny beach.
Director Luca Guadagnino, whose 2009 feature I Am Love was an even more sumptuous
melodrama starring Swinton, sets about creating a lush European character piece
under which can simmer an undercurrent of eroticism and danger. The four people
cooped up in an island getaway have intertwining pasts – it was Fiennes who
first introduced Schoenaerts to Swinton, a couple who have now been together
for many years, weathering storms that weigh with slowly revealed heaviness
upon their relationship – and yet often try to act like they don’t. On one
level it’s a movie about languorous rock and rollers at rest, stretching out
poolside, cooking wonderful meals, reading interesting literature, spinning
great records. They engage in passionate behavior, dancing, swimming, and
eating amongst skin, sun, lapping waves, and fragrant fauna. What’s better than
a late night karaoke session at a local street festival or an impromptu dance
party? And yet what are these people really up to? It’s not always clear.
There’s a lot of tension here, sexual – they’re four beautiful people in close
quarters, after all – and otherwise.
It’s a movie about looking, we at them and they at each
other. David Kajganich’s screenplay, based on a 1969 Alain Delon film called La Piscine, offers plenty of excuses to
bring characters together, trapping them in encounters tracing shifts and jabs
in relationships, often communicated nonverbally in a glance held in a
shot/reverse shot, or a showy camera swivel, or a reflection off a pair of
glasses. Guadagnino deploys splendid Yorick Le Saux camerawork in ways that
show off its fluid dexterity, pushing in and swinging around, or cut into in
quick flashes of distemper. It’s a movie that rests on its characters making
eyes at one another – lovers expressing empathy or disgust, a preening braggart
making it all about him, or a quiet girl sitting alone at a remove, testing the
waters without making the content of her thoughts clear. It tracks silent
transmissions of charged implications, tracing fault lines to an inevitable
crack-up. The danger of something bad happening is always present, though its
exact cause or source is kept tingling just out of reach. Deft flashbacks help
reveal tangled emotions long past, which help contextualize the confusion of
the present.
Four terrific performances animate what could easily be a
frustratingly vague haze. Because the actors are comfortably rooted in their
characters’ skins – the better to pull off an easy, breezy, equal-opportunity
nudity from all involved at one point or another – it’s worth investing in
their circumstances and puzzling out their motivations. Fiennes takes center
stage as a man who can’t stop talking, pick pick picking at characters’
insecurities in ways that are equally unaware and yet too targeted to be
totally dismissed as accident. This is in contrast to Swinton, whose recovering
rocker is under medical orders to remain silent, her only dialogue spoken
sparingly in a pained whisper. Schoenaerts has a solid masculine sensitivity
about him, clearly in love, a doting caretaker totally annoyed by their
unexpected guests, and yet retains corners of mystery about his emotional
place. Lastly, Johnson is what? She’s totally unknowable up to the end, at once
powerless and holding all the cards, an open book and a continually unfolding
mystery. Is she a schemer or merely aloof, a seductress or a guileless id? As
we learn just what these characters mean and mean to each other, the conflict
at a low-boil is clearly ready to boil over.
When it reaches its deliriously unsettled conclusion, the
tantalizing surface composure works to make it very cold, rejecting
conventional satisfying conclusions or answers. What could be over-the-top is
instead underplayed with dark comedy and cold laughs. (Listen to what a police
chief barks over the phone about the morgue freezer and tell me it’s not going
for deliberate gallows humor.) It is a bit deflating to turn such a hothouse of
melodrama into a bitterly ironic noir in its final moments. But Guadagnino
plays by the rules he set up, brining the characters in inevitable conflict and
springing surprising developments with a certain merciless logic. Sure, it
would be nice to cavort in the sun with gorgeous half-undressed people, but the
fun has to end sometime, and in this case the real world encroaches through
petty jealousies and sharp pangs of regret. What’s the worth of a passionate
Dionysian lifestyle if it’s so fragile people who know just the right exploitable
cracks in the façade can bring it to the brink of ruin?
Friday, August 27, 2010
Quick Look: I AM LOVE
I’m not the type of person to fall head-over-heels for Luca Guadagnino’s I Am Love, but I am not wholly immune to its aesthetic power. And if you are the type of person who’ll flip for this lush yet chilly Euro melodrama, then you are certainly in for a treat I will not begrudge you. At best, this sumptuous story about a rich Italian family floated me into its ridiculously beautiful imagery on the swirling score culled from the work of modern composer John Adams. At worst, all the aural and visual sensations distracted and distanced me from the story, leaving me cold and uninvolved. Tilda Swinton as the main character, a repressed woman who slowly realizes the extent of her confinement as her appetites – and identity – are reactivated, is the main attraction. She’s a daring actress who plays some of the most perfectly realized, and varied, characters in film today, from Michael Clayton to The Chronicles of Narnia to Orlando. She’s a treasure. The rest of the cast members (especially Flavio Parenti as Swinton’s son and Edoardo Gabbriellini as a chef with entrepreneurial aspirations) are remarkable as well; no one strikes a wrong note or lets the filmmaking overpower performance. While the style of the film left me outside the emotion of the narrative, there is such beauty in it that I find myself with warm memories of the viewing experience. Often I Am Love hypnotized me with its filmmaking, but it was almost a disappointment every time I fell out of the trance and realized that there was an actual plot underneath.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



